MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[Research on first aid measures based on convolutional neural network recognition human actions].

2020· article· en· W3123367506 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technology in Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceFrame (networking)Frame ratePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceTest setData setComputer visionArtificial neural networkDeep learningSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)Test data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of human behavior recognition based on convolutional neural network (CNN) in the new generation of pre-hospital first aid. METHODS: Sixty videos were obtained from the Montreal Falling Video Data base, and divided into model training data and evaluation test data at a ratio of 5:1. (1) Data model training: singular value decomposition was used to clarify the picture, the target boundary of the human body in the picture was identified through target detection and Fourier transform, then the human body curve was described; OpenCv computer vision and machine learning software library to estimate the body pose were used to mark the important parts of the human body (such as hips, knees), the angle between the line of important parts and the horizontal direction and the length and width ratio of the detection frame were calculated, and whether the human body had abnormal behavior was identified. (2) Evaluation test: 6 videos were randomly extracted from the model training data set, 10 frame were extracted from each video, each frame was treated as one picture, CNN behavior recognition was used on each frame, and calculated the recognition rate between normal behavior and abnormal behavior. RESULTS: In the process of data model training, each frame was artificially labeled to train the CNN human behavior recognition model. The evaluation results showed that the recognition rate of normal behavior was (90.33±3.03)%, and the recognition rate of abnormal behavior was (87.74±2.88)%. CONCLUSIONS: When passers-by have dangerous behaviors, the identification of human behaviors through CNN can determine whether they are in a critical state, and issue early warning in time, which plays a vital role in pre-hospital first aid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it