MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123395265 · doi:10.1090/tran/8373

Corrigenda to “Codomain rigidity of the Dirichlet to Neumann operator for the Riemannian wave equation”

2021· article· en· W3123395265 on OpenAlexafffund
Tristan Milne, Abdol-Reza Mansouri

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsDirichlet distributionMonotonic functionConvex functionLemma (botany)Operator (biology)Regular polygonLogarithmically convex functionRigidity (electromagnetism)Quadratic equationFunction (biology)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisCombinatoricsSubderivativeConvex optimizationBoundary value problemGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proof of Lemma 4.4 in our article, which appeared in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371 (2019), 8781–8810, contains a flaw. In proving the existence of a minimizer of the map <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="bold upper A right-arrow from bar upper I Subscript epsilon Baseline left-bracket bold upper A right-bracket"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false"> ↦ </mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbf {A} \mapsto I_\epsilon [\mathbf {A}]</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> defined therein, we stated that this map is a convex function of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="bold upper A"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbf {A}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . This is incorrect, as <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper I Subscript epsilon"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">I_\epsilon</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a composition of two convex functions, a quadratic form and an absolute value, and since the absolute value function is not monotonic, there is no guarantee that the resulting functional is convex. This short article corrects this flaw by showing that there is a continuous convex functional <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper J Subscript epsilon"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">J_\epsilon</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> such that <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper I Subscript epsilon Baseline left-bracket bold upper A right-bracket equals upper J Subscript epsilon Baseline left-bracket bold upper A squared right-bracket"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">I_\epsilon [\mathbf {A}] = J_\epsilon [\mathbf {A}^2]</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , and then employing weak lower semi-continuity of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper J Subscript epsilon"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">J_\epsilon</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> to demonstrate the existence of a minimizer of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper I Subscript epsilon"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mi> ϵ </mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">I_\epsilon</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207