MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123431855

Os clásicos desde a visión vangardista de Květa Pacovská

2020· article· es· W3123431855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmen Franco Vázquez, Marta Neira Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Aesthetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente volume, composto por treze estudos, e dado a estampa na sequencia de outros tres ja editados – a saber Ramos (2017), Mocino Gonzalez (2019) e Tabernero Sala (2019) – e substantiva um dos eixos investigativos que tem aglutinado, suscitado a atencao e motivado um trabalho de pesquisa aturado e ja consideravel por parte de investigadores pertencentes a Universidades Portuguesas (Aveiro, Minho e Evora), Espanholas (Santiago de Compostela, Vigo, Saragoca e Cadiz) e Brasileiras (Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo e Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina) Resulta, igualmente, do(s) olhar(es) pessoal(ais) – nossos, mas tambem de muitas das participantes nesta obra – que temos lancado ha alguns anos sobre o livro-objecto. Entendendo o livro para a infância como artefacto ou um objecto hibrido no qual se conjugam intersemioticamente registos esteticos diversos como o discurso literario, a ilustracao, o design ou a engenharia do papel, os treze estudos coligidos nesta obra centram-se fundamentalmente em autores reconhecidos e/ou textos classicos, originarios de paises distintos e vindos a lume em diferentes epocas, que tem servido de matriz criativa a uma surpreendente pluralidade de livros-objeto vocacionados para leitores com perfis variados (pre-leitores – por exemplo, bebes –, leitores iniciais, leitores medianos e leitores autonomos. Assim, esta colectânea valoriza classicos como Aventuras de Alice no Pais das Maravilhas, de L. Carroll, Peter Pan, de J. Barrie, ou Babar de Jean Brunhoff, e, muito particularmente, a materialidade na construcao do discurso. Por outras palavras, em termos latos, problematiza a questao da relevância da forma para o conteudo, bem como as potencialidades criativas, esteticas, ludicas, formativas e/ou didacticas de tais artefactos, por exemplo, ao nivel da formacao de leitores, que, cremos, se afigura significativamente assente na manipulacao fisica do livro, gesto que resulta numa especial ludicidade e na natural resposta a curiosidade infantil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiterature, Culture, and AestheticsFrench-language works237,207