Privacy Assured Recovery of Compressively Sensed ECG Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the areas of communications engineering and biomedical engineering, cloud computing for storing data and running complex algorithms have been steadily increasing due to the increase in internet of things and connected health. As connected IoT devices such as wearable ECG recorders generally have less storage and computational capacity, acquired signals get sent to a remote center for storage and possible analysis on demand. Recently, compressive sensing has been used as a secure, energy-efficient and fast method of signal sampling in such recorders. In this paper, we propose a secure procedure to shift away the total recovery of compressively sensed measurement to cloud and introduce a privacy-assured signal recovery technique in the cloud. We present a fast, and lightweight encryption for secure CS recovery outsourcing that can be used in wearable devices, such as ECG Holter monitors. In the proposed technique, instead of full recovery of CS-compressed ECG signal in the cloud, to preserve privacy, an encrypted version of ECG signal is recovered by using a randomly bipolar permuted measurement matrix. The user with a key, decrypts the encrypted ECG from the cloud to obtain the original ECG signal at their end. We demonstrate our proposed method using the ECG signals available in the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database. We also demonstrate the strength of the proposed method against partial exposure of the key. Experimental results on client and cloud sides show our proposed method has lower complexity and consuming time compared to the recent related works, while maintaining the quality of outsourcing task in cloud.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".