MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3123943436 · doi:10.7202/1072857ar

Le Arti and Intervention in the Arts

2020· article· fr· W3123943436 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexandra de Luise

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Arti, une revue d’art italienne peu connue, parut de 1938 à 1943. Elle avait une double mission : être une revue sérieuse d’histoire de l’art et d’archéologie ainsi qu’un véhicule d’endoctrinement fasciste de la communauté artistique durant la dernière période du régime fasciste. Vers la fin des années trente, le régime utilisait son vaste réseau d’expositions, les associations artistiques, divers programmes et publications comme Le Arti pour contrôler l’expression artistique. Le Arti demeure un exemple du contrôle qu’exerçait le gouvernment sur les arts et faisait partie d’un plan soigneusement élaboré visant à les centraliser sous la direction d’une agence gouvernementale. Elle était dominée par le ministre italien de l’Éducation nationale, Giuseppe Bottai, un haut dirigeant du régime. La revue était celle qui, parmi les publications italiennes se rapprochait le plus de la revue allemande, Die Kunst im Dritten Reich et sut recruter quelques-uns des plus grands historiens de l’art italien de l’époque en les utilisant comme conseillers et comme rédacteurs. Le Arti fut en mesure d’exister pendant la période la plus difficile de l’histoire italienne et cessa de paraître avec la chute du fascisme en 1943.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.040
Scholarly communication0.0140.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207