PENGARUH PEMBIAYAAN TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI PERIODE 2012-2019
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a significant influence of Financing on the profitability at Syariah Mandiri Bank for the 2012-2019 Period. The analytical tool in this study uses Multiple Linear Regression analysis. The type of data used is secondary data in the form of quantitative data obtained from the official website of Syariah Mandiri Bank in the first quarter of 2012 - the third quarter of 2019. The results of the study indicate that there is a partially positive and significant influence on mudharabah financing on Return On Assets (ROA), then there is the negative and significant influence of murabahah financing on Return On Assets (ROA), while musyarakah, istishna, and ijarah financing has no significant influence on Return On Assets (ROA). Simultaneously there are positive and significant influences on mudharabah, musyarakah, murabahah, istishna, and ijarah financing on Return On Assets (ROA). The results of the analysis of the Adjusted R Square determination coefficient show that 0.273 or 27.3% of the contribution of mudharabah, musyarakah, murabahah, istishna, and ijarah financing influence ROA, while the remaining 72.7% is influenced by other variables not included in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it