Уникальный карабахский ковер «Гасымушагы»: происхождение, символизм и особенности дизайна
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the issues of origin, symbolism and design features of the rare Karabakh carpet Gasimushagi. The name of the carpet reflects the traditional name of the territory of the life area of the Karabakh tribes with the self-name Gasimushagy, which means Children / descendants of Gasim. The uniqueness of the carpet is due to its relationship with the famous dragon carpets of Karabakh. The article traces the evolution of the Gasimushagi carpet from dragon carpets of the Safavid era – to carpets of the end of the first quarter of the 20th century. The analysis of artistic and typological samples of design carpets made it possible to state its genetic connection with the dragon carpets of Karabakh, as well as late carpets from the regions of Azerbaijan – Shirvan, Kazakh, Cuba. The main motives of the carpet have undeniable parallels with the motives of Azerbaijani carpets from these regions. The typologically recognizable motif of the Gasimushagi carpet is the famous central medallion (rosette), from which paired sleeves (Gol), containing the motif of climbing plants with small flowers, extend up and down. The weavers of this carpet conditionally have this motif spider. The central field of the rosette carpet has remained recognizable for over a century. The border of the “Gasimushagi” carpets has several options, which are identical to the decorative borders of not only Karabakh, but also Shirvan and Kazakh carpets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".