MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3124119524

Compassion Fatigue and Empathy among Nurses Working in Adult Intensive Care Units, PGIMER, Chandigarh 2019–20

2021· article· en· W3124119524 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Baljinder Kaur, Hema Ram, Lovepreet Kaur, Rajendra Yadav, Shikha Pandey, Monika Dutta, Prabhjot Kaur, Navneet Dhaliwal

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch & Reviews: A Journal of Health Professions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompassion fatigueBurnoutEmpathyCompassionIntensive careClinical psychologyNursingMedicinePsychologyIntensive care unitPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To assess and compare the level of empathy and compassion fatigue among nurses working in the adult intensive care units. Methodology: A descriptive-comparative study design was adopted and total 120 nurses (Male= 60, Female= 60) were purposively selected. Participant’s information questionnaire, Professionals quality of life scale and Toronto empathy questionnaire were used for the data collection. Research setting was adult intensive care units of PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. The data were analyzed using SPSS (version 20). Result: Mean age of the male and female participants was 32.25 and 30.43years respectively. Most of the nurses were graduates and more than half had 1–5years intensive care unit working experience. Level of empathy was significantly higher (0.05) in female nurses as compared to male nurses. Correlation analysis showed that empathy had significant and positive association with compassion satisfaction and had negative relationship with burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Highly significant; negative relationship exists between compassion satisfaction and burnout. Burnout and secondary traumatic stress showed significant and positive association with each other. Conclusion: Empathetic and compassionate nursing professionals would be able to handle fatalistic aspects of exposure to mankind sufferings and illnesses. Negative association of burnout with compassion satisfaction and empathy will also contribute towards patient care provided by nurses in intensive care settings. Keywords: Empathy, compassion satisfaction, burnout, secondary traumatic stress Cite this Article Baljinder Kaur, Hema Ram, Lovepreet Kaur, Rajendra Yadav, Shikha Pandey, Monika Dutta, Prabhjot Kaur, Navneet Dhaliwal. Compassion Fatigue and Empathy among Nurses Working in Adult Intensive Care Units, PGIMER, Chandigarh 2019–20. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Health Professions. 2020; 10(3): 19–29p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.419
GPT teacher head0.597
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch & Reviews: A Journal of Health Professions→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→