MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Non-Interactive Truth Discovery for Mobile Crowdsensing

2020· article· en· W3124231858 on OpenAlexaff
Chuan Zhang, Liehuang Zhu, Chang Xu, Jianbing Ni, Cheng Huang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooQueen's University
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCrowdsensingComputer scienceInternet privacyHuman–computer interactionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Truth discovery is one of the key technologies to extract truthful information from unreliable sensory data collected by different mobile devices in mobile crowdsensing, but the sensory data and the outputs of truth discovery (i.e., truths and mobile devices' weights) may contain sensitive information and cause serious privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preServing non-interActive Truth discovEry scheme (SATE) in mobile crowdsensing. Specifically, SATE is designed based on a two-cloud model. First, the sensory data is encoded into two parts (i.e., perturbed data and noises) at the mobile device, which are maintained by two clouds separately. Second, by utilizing an adapted distributed public key homomorphic cryptosystem, two clouds can co-operatively exchange the intermediate weights and truths in a privacy preserving manner and thus achieve privacy-preserving truth discovery without the participation of the mobile devices. Security analysis demonstrates that SATE can provide full privacy protection for sensory data, weights, and truths. Performance evaluation also shows that SATE can achieve high computational efficiency and low communication overhead on the mobile devices, since there is no time-consuming cryptographic operation involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingFrench-language works237,207