MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Non-Interactive Truth Discovery for Mobile Crowdsensing

2020· article· en· W3124231858 on OpenAlexaff
Chuan Zhang, Liehuang Zhu, Chang Xu, Jianbing Ni, Cheng Huang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooQueen's University
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCrowdsensingComputer scienceInternet privacyHuman–computer interactionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Truth discovery is one of the key technologies to extract truthful information from unreliable sensory data collected by different mobile devices in mobile crowdsensing, but the sensory data and the outputs of truth discovery (i.e., truths and mobile devices' weights) may contain sensitive information and cause serious privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preServing non-interActive Truth discovEry scheme (SATE) in mobile crowdsensing. Specifically, SATE is designed based on a two-cloud model. First, the sensory data is encoded into two parts (i.e., perturbed data and noises) at the mobile device, which are maintained by two clouds separately. Second, by utilizing an adapted distributed public key homomorphic cryptosystem, two clouds can co-operatively exchange the intermediate weights and truths in a privacy preserving manner and thus achieve privacy-preserving truth discovery without the participation of the mobile devices. Security analysis demonstrates that SATE can provide full privacy protection for sensory data, weights, and truths. Performance evaluation also shows that SATE can achieve high computational efficiency and low communication overhead on the mobile devices, since there is no time-consuming cryptographic operation involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingFrench-language works237,207