MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124323804 · doi:10.1155/2021/6616800

Dynamic Spatiotemporal Causality Analysis for Network Traffic Flow Based on Transfer Entropy and Sliding Window Approach

2021· article· en· W3124323804 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Senyan Yang, Lianju Ning, Xilong Cai, Mingyu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeijing Municipal Natural Science FoundationChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransfer entropyComputer scienceCausality (physics)Traffic flow (computer networking)Entropy (arrow of time)Sliding window protocolData miningTraffic congestion reconstruction with Kerner's three-phase theoryGranger causalityIntelligent transportation systemTraffic generation modelReal-time computingEngineeringTraffic congestionArtificial intelligencePrinciple of maximum entropyMachine learningTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of sensor and communication technologies, a large amount of spatiotemporal traffic data has been accumulated, presenting the characteristics of big data. The potential information and regularity of traffic state evolution can be extracted from the huge traffic flow time series data and applied to intelligent transportation systems. This study proposes a dynamic spatiotemporal causality modeling approach to analyze traffic causal relationships for the large-scale road network. Transfer entropy algorithm is utilized to detect the spatiotemporal causality of network traffic states based on the extensive traffic time series data, which could measure the amount and direction of information transmission. A combination of Gaussian kernel density estimation and sliding window approach is proposed to calculate the transfer entropy and construct dynamic spatiotemporal causality graphs based on the causality significance test. The indexes of affected coefficient, influence coefficient, input degree, and output degree are defined to evaluate the causal interaction of traffic states among different road segments and identify the critical roads and potential bottlenecks of the existing road network. Experimental results based on real-world traffic sensor data indicate that the structures of traffic causality graphs are time-varying; the traffic cause-effect interaction among different road segments during the peak time is more significant than that during the nonpeak time; and the critical road segments can be identified, which are mainly located at the intersections of arterial roads, undertaking the convergence and dispersion of large traffic flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207