PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TEHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA HOTEL NON BINTANG DI BANDUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the effect of transformational leadership, organizational culture toward employee performance. Sampling in this study using a Stratified Random Sampling and the size of 92 respondents, methods of analysis use path Analysis. The results showed that based on the preception of respondents, the overall variable transformotional leadership in the category quite well toward good, look that variable tranformational leadership (X1) has a direct amount to 13,62%, indirect effect throught its realtionship culture organization (X2) amount to 11,30, and total the effect 24,92%. Culture organitation has a direct amount to 29,38%, indirect effect throught its relationship tranformational leadership 11,30% and total the effect 40,68%. The coefecient of determination calculation result is equal to 65,59%. The result of reseach concludes that there are partially and stimultaneously significanteffect of transformational leadership variable, organizational culture toward employee performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".