MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124464435 · doi:10.1007/s40273-020-00995-3

Early-Phase Clinical Trials and Reimbursement Submissions to the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review

2021· letter· en· W3124464435 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Adam Raymakers, Kristina Jenei, Dean A. Regier, Michael Burgess, Stuart Peacock

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacoEconomics · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsReimbursementQuality of Life ResearchHealth economicsMedicineClinical trialPublic healthHealth administrationDrug approvalFamily medicineClinical OncologyOncologyAlternative medicineDrugDrug developmentInternal medicinePharmacologyHealth careNursingPolitical scienceCancerPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.095
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.095
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0660.025
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.725
GPT teacher head0.621
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainEvaluation
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePharmacoEconomicsSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207