Revisiting the System Silanes–Polysaccharides: The Cases of THEOS–Chitosan and MeTHEOS–Chitosan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The glycol alkoxysilanes, tetrakis(2‐hydroxyethyl)silane (THEOS), and tris(2‐hydroxyethyl)methyl silane (MeTHEOS) are water soluble derivatives of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and methyltriethoxysilane (MeTEOS) and precursors of the system silane–chitosan reviewed in this work. The glycol modified alkoxysilanes are obtained by transesterification reaction of TEOS or MeTEOS with ethylene glycol. The reaction evolution is monitored by 29Si NMR. It is possible to observe the formation of the various species of glycol alkoxysilanes in equilibrium as the reaction proceeds showing that the oligomers formation is favored at longer reaction times with the final product tendency to gel keeping the complete water solubility. The glycol alkoxysilanes are synthesized at moderated reaction conditions, by using the Piers–Rubinsztajn (PR) reaction. Additionally, it is already known that THEOS is compatible with different natural polysaccharides as chitosan and the same behavior has been demonstrated in this work for MeTHEOS. Several reports refer studies regarding the system THEOS–polysaccharides to synthesize hybrid materials. The system THEOS–chitosan is known but the characterization as well as the way silane–chitosan interact has not been studied in detail. In the present report, chemical evidence of the covalent interactions THEOS– and MeTHEOS–chitosan based on NMR studies (13C and 29Si) are presented as intended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".