MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124799479

The Identifiability Bias in Environmental Law

2007· article· en· W3124799479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLegal and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentifiabilityLawmakingLaw and economicsDoctrineEnvironmental lawCommon lawPolitical scienceLawPublic economicsEconomicsLegislature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE IDENTIFIABILITY BIAS 435Herceptin would become fundable by the province within a few months. 6Health Minister George Smitherman was quoted in the article as saying "I'm a human being like anybody else and I'm personally impacted by personal stories . . . .I have a very, very keen personal sense of the degree to which this is a tremendously impactful decision point for some women and many families in the province of Ontario." 7 It certainly seems callous to take issue with the Health Minister's intervention.But, one wonders, when George Smitherman jumped Herceptin to the top of the queue, what drugs were pushed aside?Might there have been people who were hurt by this move?One drug that might have been held up was Methotrexate, which was approved for provincial funding in October 2005, shortly after Herceptin's approval. 8Methotrexate is a curiously versatile drug that is used in chemotherapy treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (most commonly children's leukemia), rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and ironically, breast cancer. 9Much is still unknown about Methotrexate, despite a great deal of clinical study. 10Was a possible delay in the funding of Methotrexate worth it?Quite possibly, but a rational inquiry would examine a variety of factors, including the incidences of the diseases treated by Methotrexate and Herceptin, their effectiveness in treating such diseases, their incremental effectiveness relative to existing treatments, and perhaps their cost.The week that Herceptin was approved, the Canadian Medical Association Journal published an editorial questioning the wisdom of the province's approval, especially given the $148 million price tag funding Herceptin and two other drugs over a three-year period. 11ut the way that a newspaper story changed, in one day, the priorities of the largest provincial health ministry in Canada is much more important and subtle.The response to the June 23, 2005 article, which focused so intensely on Leslie Cowan and her family, 12.Although they do not set out a formal definition, Deborah A. Small & George Loewenstein describe and study the phenomenon in more specificity in their article The Devil You Know: The Effects of Identifiability on Punishment.18

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLegal and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207