MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124826634 · doi:10.1109/ccc.1997.612315

Circuits and expressions with non-associative gates

2002· preprint· en· W3124826634 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Berman, Arthur A. Drisko, F. Lemieu, Cristopher Moore, Denis Thérien

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersChengdu University of Information Technology
KeywordsIterated functionMultiplication (music)Associative propertySemigroupAbelian groupMathematicsExpression (computer science)Discrete mathematicsClass (philosophy)Value (mathematics)Algebra over a fieldArithmeticComputer sciencePure mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider circuits and expressions whose gates carry out multiplication in a non-associative groupoid such as loop. We define a class we call the polyabelian groupoids, formed by iterated quasidirect products of Abelian groups. We show that a loop can express arbitrary Boolean functions if and only if it is not polyabelian, in which case its EXPRESSION EVALUATION and CIRCUIT VALUE problems are NC/sup 1/-complete and P-complete respectively. This is not true for groupoids in general, and we give a counter-example. We show that EXPRESSION EVALUATION is also NC/sup 1/-complete if the groupoid has a non-solvable multiplication semigroup, but is in TC/sup 0/ if the groupoid is both polyabelian and has a solvable multiplication semigroup. Thus, in the non-associative case, earlier results about the role of solvability in circuit complexity generalize in several different ways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207