MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3124925689 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039896

Star formation quenching stages of active and non-active galaxies

2021· article· en· W3124925689 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of OxfordNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaYork UniversityCarnegie Institution for ScienceMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGalaxyActive galactic nucleusPeculiar galaxyLuminous infrared galaxyGalaxy groupDiscElliptical galaxyRadio galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms that bring galaxies to strongly reduce their star formation activity (star-formation quenching) remain poorly understood. To better study galaxy evolution, we propose a classification based on maps of ionised hydrogen distribution traced by the kiloparsec-resolved, equivalent width of H α maps, and the nuclear activity of the galaxies using information from the Baldwin-Philips-Terlevich diagnostic diagrams. Using these tools, we group a sample of 238 galaxies from the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field spectroscopy Area survey in six quenching stages (QSs): (i) objects dominated by recent star formation; (ii) systems that present a quiescent-nuclear-ring structure in their centre; (iii) galaxies that are centrally quiescent; (iv) galaxies with no clear pattern in their ionisation gas distribution (mixed); (v) systems that posses only a few star-forming regions (nearly retired), or (vi) galaxies that are completely quiescent (fully retired). Regarding their nuclear activity, we further divide the galaxies into two groups: active systems that host a weak or strong active galactic nucleus (AGN) at their centre, and non-active objects. Galaxies grouped into quenching-stage classes occupy specific locations on the star-formation-rate versus stellar mass diagram. The ‘blue cloud’ is populated by the star-forming and the quiescent-nuclear-ring galaxies, the ‘green valley’ is populated by centrally quiescent and mixed systems, and the ‘red sequence’ by the nearly- and fully retired objects. Generally, galaxies that host a weak or strong AGN show properties comparable to those of their non-active counterparts at the same QSs, except for the AGN-hosting star-forming systems. The degree of star-formation quenching increases along the present emission-line pattern sequence from star-forming to fully retired. The proposed emission-line classes reinforce the ‘inside-out’ quenching scenario, which foresees that the suppression of star formation begins from the central regions of the galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→