Vascular hitch for paediatric pelvi‐ureteric junction obstruction with crossing vessels: institutional analysis and systematic review with meta‐analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes for laparoscopic vascular hitch (VH) and dismembered pyeloplasty in patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) secondary to crossing vessels (CV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic management of CV at our institution were identified between 2008 and 2020. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures were compared between those who underwent VH and those who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty. Those who underwent VH were selected intraoperatively by identifying CV in the absence of intrinsic obstruction by assessing resolution of hydronephrosis after cranially displacing the CV away from the PUJ, followed by intraoperative fluid bolus and diuretic test. In addition, a systematic search and meta-analysis were performed in June 2020 (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] ID CRD42020195833). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients underwent VH and 74 dismembered pyeloplasty. On multivariate analysis, VH was associated with: shorter operative time (P = 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 0.455, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.294-0.705) and length of stay (P = 0.012; OR 0.383, 95% CI 0.183-0.803), lower use of stents (P < 0.001; OR 0.024, 95% CI 0.004-0.141) and opioid administration (P = 0.005; OR 0.157, 95% CI 0.044-0.567). From our literature search, 194 records were identified and 18 records were included (three comparative and 16 non-comparative). Meta-analysis of the comparative studies and our institutional data showed similar success rates (relative risk [RR] 1.77, 95% CI 0.33-9.52) and complication rates (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.20-2.82). VH was associated with shorter operative time (standardised mean difference [SMD] -1.65, 95% CI -2.58 to -0.72 h) and hospital stay (SMD -1.41, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.47 days). The VH success rates ranged from 87.5% to 100% in the identified studies. Failure of VH was associated with unrecognised concomitant intrinsic obstruction in addition to CV. CONCLUSIONS: A VH, for well-selected patients with CV without concomitant intrinsic obstruction, offers a high success rate with shorter operative times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.028 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".