Efficient Privacy-Preserving Similarity Range Query based on Pre-Computed Distances in eHealthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advance of smart eHealthcare and cloud computing techniques has propelled an increasing number of healthcare centers to outsource their healthcare data to the cloud. Meanwhile, in order to preserve the privacy of the sensitive information, healthcare centers tend to encrypt the data before outsourcing them to the cloud. Although the data encryption technique can preserve the privacy of the data, it inevitably hinders the query functionalities over the outsourced data. Among all practical query functionalities, the similarity range query is one of the most popular ones. However, to our best knowledge, many existing studies on the similarity range query over outsourced data still suffer from the efficiency issue in the query process. Therefore, in this paper, aiming at improving the query efficiency, we propose an efficient privacy-preserving similarity range query scheme based on the precomputed distance technique. In specific, we first introduce a pre-computed distance based similarity range query (PreDSQ) algorithm, which can improve the query efficiency by precomputing some distances. Then, we propose our privacy-preserving similarity query scheme by applying an asymmetric scalar-product-preserving encryption technique to preserve the privacy of the PreDSQ algorithm. Both security analysis and performance evaluation are conducted, and the results show that our proposed scheme is efficient and can well preserve the privacy of data records and query requests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".