Comparative studies of the noncovalent interactions in the single‐crystal packing of pyrene, pyrene‐4,5‐dione, and pyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pyrene‐4,5‐dione and pyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone are K‐region oxidized derivatives of pyrene, which show interesting structural and electronic properties as well as useful application in organic electronic and optoelectronic devices. The single‐crystal structures of pyrene and pyrene‐4,5‐dione have been published, but the crystallographic data of pyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone has not. In this work, the single‐crystal structure of pyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone has been clearly elucidated for the first time, and the detailed crystallographic properties were analyzed and discussed in comparison with those of pyrene and pyrene‐4,5‐dione. Various noncovalent interactions taking place within the supramolecular assemblies that exist in the crystal packing of these compounds were studied by Hirshfeld surface analysis and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Our joint experimental and computational analyses provide fundamental understanding of the electron density properties, interaction energies, and frontier molecular orbital (FMO) properties for these pyrene systems and establish correlations of these properties with diverse supramolecular assembling motifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".