Misperception of sleep duration in mild traumatic brain injury/concussion: a preliminary report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Polysomnographic (PSG) findings of persons with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)/concussion show longer total sleep time than patients themselves report; the reason for this is not entirely clear.Objective: This study aimed to elucidate the socio-demographic, brain-injury-related, and clinical characteristics that underlie accuracy of sleep duration reporting in mTBI/concussion.Methods: Thirty-seven participants diagnosed with mTBI/concussion (57% male, 47.54 ± 11.3 years old) underwent clinical and neuroimaging examinations, full-night PSG, and estimated sleep duration following PSG.Results: Mean self-reported sleep duration was 342 ± 93.6 minutes and PSG-measured sleep duration was 382 ± 76.8 minutes. Measurements were moderately correlated (rho = 0.46, p = .004). Age associated with self- and PSG-measured sleep duration (rho = 0.34 and rho = 0.84, respectively, p < .05). Self-reported sleep duration was uniquely associated with insomnia severity (rho = −0.48, p = .002). In the fully adjusted multivariable regression analysis, several clinical characteristics of patients explained 30% of the discrepancy between self- and PSG-measured sleep duration.Conclusion: The observed results indicate that persons with mTBI do not accurately assess their sleep duration and, therefore, PSG is warranted in clinical situations where sleep duration is of concern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".