Expression pattern of the V5‐Ostm1 protein in bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations in the osteopetrotic transmembrane protein 1 (Ostm1) gene are responsible for the most severe form of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis both in humans and in the gray lethal (gl/gl) mouse. This defect leads to increased bone mass with bone marrow occlusion and hematopoietic defects. To establish the expression profile of the mouse Ostm1 protein in vivo, homologous recombination in bacteria was designed to generate a V5-Ostm1 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) that was subsequently integrated in the mouse genome. Tissue expression of the transgene V5-Ostm1 RNA and protein in transgenic mice follow the endogenous expression profile. Immunohistochemistry analysis demonstrated expression in neuronal populations from central and peripheral nervous system and defined a unique cellular expression pattern. Importantly, together with appropriate protein post-translational modification, in vivo rescue of the osteopetrotic bone gl/gl phenotype in BAC V5-Ostm1 gl/gl mice is consistent with the expression of a fully functional and active protein. These mice represent a unique tool to unravel novel Ostm1 functions in individual tissue and neuronal cell populations and the V5-Ostm1 transgene represents an easy visual marker to monitor the expression of Ostm1 in vitro and in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".