A Horse of a Different Color: A Study of Color Bias, Antitrust and Restraint of Trade Violations in the Equine Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2000, Kay Floyd sued the American Quarter Horse Association ("AQHA") as a result of a registration rule Floyd alleged discriminated against her economically. She did not challenge the right of AQHA to create registration rules that maintained the integrity of the breed, but she challenged its right to prevent her from registering a horse born to two AQHA-registered parents that fit every registration criterion except one. Floyd challenged AQHA's right to prevent her from registering a second pairing from the same parents because that foal was born through embryo transplant in the same year as a foal born through natural birth. Floyd brought suit under the restraint of trade provisions of the Texas Business & Commerce Code. Those provisions comply with federal statutes against anti-trust and restraint of trade, and comply with the United States Supreme Court rulings concerning those topics. The Texas lower court that heard Floyd's complaint agreed with her allegations and gave AQHA one of its few adverse rulings relating to the way it ran its business. The result was a settlement with Floyd, registration of both her horses, and a change in multiple AQHA registration rules. This article examines Floyd, its long-range effect on AQHA, and the implications of the ruling on other voluntary or non-profit associations, both within and without the animal industry. In particular, this article applies the principles of the Floyd ruling to the American Paint Horse Association.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".