MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125931520 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.l091301

Physics reach of a low threshold scintillating argon bubble chamber in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering reactor experiments

2021· article· en· W3125931520 on OpenAlexafffund
L. J. Flores, Eduardo Peinado, E. Alfonso-Pita, K. Allen, M. Baker, E. Behnke, M. Bressler, K. Clark, R. Coppejans, C. Cripe, M. Crisler, C. E. Dahl, A. De St. Croix, Daniel Durnford, P. Giampa, O. Harris, P. Hatch, H. Hawley-Herrera, C. M. Jackson, Youngju Ko, C. B. Krauss, N. Lamb, M. Laurin, I. Levine, W. H. Lippincott, R. Neilson, Sanjoy Kumar Pal, M.-C. Piro, Z. Sheng, E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, T. J. Whitis, S. Windle, R. Zhang, A. Zuñiga-Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversitySnolabQueen's UniversityUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFermilabWestern Canada Research GridCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of EnergyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftFundación Marcos Moshinsky
KeywordsPhysicsNeutrinoNuclear physicsBubble chamberElastic scatteringJet (fluid)Monte Carlo methodScatteringBubbleSensitivity (control systems)Particle physicsOpticsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physics reach of a low threshold (100 eV) scintillating argon bubble chamber sensitive to coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering ($\mathrm{CE}\ensuremath{\nu}\mathrm{NS}$) from reactor neutrinos is studied. The sensitivity to the weak mixing angle, neutrino magnetic moment, and a light ${Z}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ gauge boson mediator are analyzed. A Monte Carlo simulation of the backgrounds is performed to assess their contribution to the signal. The analysis shows that world-leading sensitivities are achieved with a one-year exposure for a 10 kg chamber at 3 m from a $1\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{MW}}_{th}$ research reactor or a 100 kg chamber at 30 m from a $2000\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{MW}}_{th}$ power reactor. Such a detector has the potential to become the leading technology to study $\mathrm{CE}\ensuremath{\nu}\mathrm{NS}$ using nuclear reactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207