MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125941515 · doi:10.1002/fld.4963

A stabilized finite element method based on characteristic‐based polynomial pressure projection scheme for incompressible flows

2021· article· en· W3125941515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCentral South UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuadrilateralMathematicsProjection (relational algebra)Finite element methodGalerkin methodProjection methodCompressibilityPressure-correction methodIncompressible flowPolynomialMathematical analysisConstant (computer programming)Applied mathematicsGeometryFlow (mathematics)Dykstra's projection algorithmMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMechanicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a characteristic‐based polynomial pressure projection (CBP3) scheme is proposed to stabilize finite element method for solving incompressible laminar flow. The characteristic‐Galerkin (CG) method is adopted as the stabilization for convection caused oscillation in CBP3 scheme. The pressure oscillation caused by incompressible constraint is stabilized by the polynomial pressure projection (P3) technique. Proposed scheme is suitable for any element using the equal‐order approximation for velocity and pressure. In this paper, the linear triangular and bilinear quadrilateral elements are adopted. The constant pressure projection is used for triangular elements. The CBP3 formulations for quadrilateral element are derived using both constant and linear pressure projections. Besides, the quasi‐implicit second‐order time stepping is adopted. The verification of CBP3 scheme implementation and validation of CBP3 scheme are accomplished by calculating several benchmarks. The results of CBP3 scheme reveal that the linear pressure projection for quadrilateral element is not appropriate due to its severe pressure oscillation. The well‐agreed results of CBP3 scheme using constant pressure projection demonstrate its good stabilization for FEM to solve both low and relatively high Reynolds number flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it