Metabolic Availability of Lysine in Cooked Sorghum in Healthy Adult Males using the Combined Indicator Amino Acid Oxidation and Slope Ratio Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metabolic Availability of Lysine in Cooked Sorghum in Healthy Adult Males Using the Combined Indicator Amino Acid Oxidation and Slope Ratio Method Alyssa Paoletti Master of Science The Department of Nutritional Sciences University of Toronto 2019 Abstract The metabolic availability (MA) of lysine was studied using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) method in 5 healthy adult men. Each subject participated in 8 experiments. Principles of slope-ratio were applied to evaluate the MA of lysine in sorghum by comparing the IAAO response to varying intakes of lysine in cooked sorghum relative to the IAAO response to free crystalline lysine. The IAAO response to complementing lysine from sorghum and lentils in a mixed meal format was also assessed. The MA of lysine from cooked sorghum was found to be 94%. Complementation with lentils resulted in a decline in oxidation reflecting increased protein synthesis. The findings demonstrate that most of the lysine in cooked sorghum is available for protein synthesis. A combination of sorghum and lentil in a 1: 1 ratio is recommended for individuals consuming a plant-based sorghum and lentil diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".