MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3126272959 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01480

Field decomposition of Bt-506 maize leaves and its effect on collembola in the black soil region of Northeast China

2021· article· en· W3126272959 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Baifeng Wang, Junqi Yin, Fengci Wu, Zhilei Jiang, Xinyuan Song

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Conservation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsLitterAgronomyNitrogenDecompositionAnimal scienceBiologyAbundance (ecology)Plant litterBotanyChemistryEcologyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The litters of Bt corn would go into the soil through straw returning and field ploughing after cultivation. To clarify whether the leaf litter decomposition rate and the non-target soil Collembola were influenced by the Bt protein or other litter properties in leaf litters of Bt corn in Northeast China, leaf litterbags of Bt-506, its near isoline Zheng 58 and a local type Zhengdan 958 were used in the field in Northeast China. The leaf decomposition rate, the leaf properties and the collembolan community in litterbags were investigated later. After seven months, only 43.5 ng/g Bt protein in Bt-506 leaf litter was left. All the investigated indices were not significantly different between Bt-506 and its near isoline Zheng 58. But when compared with local type Zhengdan 958, Bt-506 and its near isoline Zheng 58 contained lower non-structural carbohydrate content but higher total nitrogen content, and had lower litter decomposition rate and less abundance of Collembola. Collembolan abundance and litter decomposition rate were both significantly correlated with the non-structural carbohydrate and total nitrogen contents of the leaf litters. Field study results revealed Bt protein did not affect the leaf litter decomposition rate and the collembolan community in leaf litterbags in short term. The significant differences of these investigated indices among corn types were caused by the different non-structural carbohydrate and total nitrogen contents in leaf litter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and Conservation→Same topicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology→French-language works237,207→