Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hippocampal subfields are defined by their unique cytoarchitectures, which many recent studies have tried to map to human in-vivo MRI because of their promise to further our understanding of hippocampal function, or its dysfunction in disease. However, recent anatomical literature has highlighted broad inter-individual variability in hippocampal morphology and subfield locations, much of which can be attributed to different folding configurations within hippocampal (or archicortical) tissue. Inspired in part by analogous surface-based neocortical analysis methods, the current thesis aimed to develop a standardized coordinate framework, or surface-based method, that respects the topology of all hippocampal folding configurations. I developed such a coordinate framework in Chapter 2, which was initialized by detailed manual segmentations of hippocampal grey matter and high myelin laminae which are visible in 7-Tesla MRI and which separate different hippocampal folds. This framework was leveraged to i) computationally unfold the hippocampus which provided implicit topological inter-individual alignment, ii) delineate subfields with high reliability and validity, and iii) extract novel structural features of hippocampal grey matter. In Chapter 3, I applied this coordinate framework to the open source BigBrain 3D histology dataset. With this framework, I computationally extracted morphological and laminar features and showed that they are sufficient to derive hippocampal subfields in a data-driven manner. This underscores the sensitivity of these computational measures and the validity of the applied subfield definitions. Finally, the unfolding coordinate framework developed in Chapter 2 and extended in Chapter 3 requires manual detection of different tissue classes that separate folds in hippocampal grey matter. This is costly in the time and the expertise required. Thus, in Chapter 4, I applied state-of-the-art deep learning methods in the open source Human Connectome Project MRI dataset to automate this process. This allowed for scalable application of the methods described in Chapters 2, 3, and 4 to similar new datasets, with support for extensions to suit data of different modalities or resolutions. Overall, the projects presented here provide multifaceted evidence for the strengths of a surface-based approach to hippocampal analysis as developed in this thesis, and these methods are readily deployable in new neuroimaging work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".