ASSOCIATION OF IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To find out the probable association of iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic renal failure and to find out serum hepcidin and hemoglobin levels with iron and inflammation status in patients of chronic renal failure
 Study Design: Cross sectional study
 Place and Duration of Study: Social Security Teaching Hospital Lahore from 1st March 2016 to 30th September 2016.
 Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients were included. Serum hepcidin, ferritin, high sensitivity C-reactive protein and iron levels were measured using standard methods. Statistical correlations were established.
 Results: There were 15 (30%) females and 35 (70%) males with mean age of 50.55±14.4 years. A significant correlations was seen between hepcidin with iron status, nutritional and inflammatory markers such as ferritin, total iron binding capacity and albumin (p<0.05 respectively). An inverse relationship was seen between hepcidin and hemoglobin levels (p<0.05)
 Conclusion: A negative correlation of hepcidin with hemoglobin level in these patients with inadequate iron stores, which could be effective in the development of an anemia in such patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it