Sex differences in cardiorespiratory fitness are explained by blood volume and oxygen carrying capacity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Intrinsic sex differences in fundamental blood attributes have long been hypothesized to contribute to the gap in cardiorespiratory fitness between men and women. This study experimentally assessed the role of blood volume and oxygen (O2) carrying capacity on sex differences in cardiac function and aerobic power. METHODS AND RESULTS: Healthy women and men (n = 60) throughout the mature adult lifespan (42-88 yr) were matched by age and physical activity levels. Transthoracic echocardiography, central blood pressure, and O2 uptake were assessed throughout incremental exercise (cycle ergometry). Main outcomes such as left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), and peak O2 uptake (VO2peak), as well as blood volume (BV) were determined with established methods. Measurements were repeated in men following blood withdrawal and O2 carrying capacity reduction matching women's levels. Prior to blood normalization, BV and O2 carrying capacity were markedly reduced in women compared with men (P < 0.001). Blood normalization resulted in a precise match of BV (82.36 ± 9.83 vs. 82.34 ± 7.70 ml·kg-1, P = 0.993) and O2 carrying capacity (12.0 ± 0.6 vs. 12.0 ± 0.7 g·dl-1, P = 0.562) between women and men. Body size-adjusted cardiac filling and output (LVEDV, SV, Q) during exercise as well as VO2peak (30.8 ± 7.5 vs. 35.6 ± 8.7 ml·min-1·kg-1, P < 0.001) were lower in women compared with men prior to blood normalization. VO2peak did not differ between women and men after blood normalization (30.8 ± 7.5 vs. 29.7 ± 7.4 ml·min-1·kg-1, P = 0.551). CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in cardiorespiratory fitness are abolished when blood attributes determining O2 delivery are experimentally matched between adult women and men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it