Functional network alterations differently associated with suicidal ideas and acts in depressed patients: an indirect support to the transition model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transition from suicidal ideas to a suicide act is an important topic of research for the identification of those patients at risk of acting out. We investigated here whether specific brain activity and connectivity measures at rest may be differently associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. A large sample of acutely depressed patients with major depressive disorder was recruited in three different centers (Montreal/Canada, Stanford/USA, and Jena/Germany), covering four different phenotypes: patients with a past history of suicide attempt (n = 53), patients with current suicidal ideas but no past history of suicide attempt (n = 40), patients without current suicidal ideation nor past suicide attempts (n = 42), and healthy comparison subjects (n = 107). 3-T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures of the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and degree centrality (DC) were obtained and examined in a whole-brain data-driven analysis. Past suicide attempt was associated with a double cortico-subcortical dissociation in ALFF values. Decreased ALFF and DC values mainly in a frontoparietal network and increased ALFF values in some subcortical regions (hippocampus and thalamus) distinguished suicide attempters from suicide ideators, patient controls, and healthy controls. No clear neural differences were identified in relation to suicidal ideas. Suicide attempters appear to be a distinct subgroup of patients with widespread brain alterations in functional activity and connectivity that could represent factors of vulnerability. Our results also indirectly support at the neurobiological level the relevance of the transition model described at the psychological and clinical levels. The brain bases of suicidal ideas occurrence in depressed individuals needs further investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".