MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126618193 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2021.3058061

Modified Stacked Autoencoder Using Adaptive Morlet Wavelet for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery

2021· article· en· W3126618193 on OpenAlexaff
Min Xia, Jiafu Wan, Clarence W. de Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHorizon 2020National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMorlet waveletAutoencoderFault (geology)WaveletArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringWavelet transformDeep learningDiscrete wavelet transformGeologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent fault diagnosis techniques play an important role in improving the abilities of automated monitoring, inference, and decision making for the repair and maintenance of machinery and processes. In this article, a modified stacked autoencoder (MSAE) that uses adaptive Morlet wavelet is proposed to automatically diagnose various fault types and severities of rotating machinery. First, the Morlet wavelet activation function is utilized to construct an MSAE to establish an accurate nonlinear mapping between the raw nonstationary vibration data and different fault states. Then, the nonnegative constraint is applied to enhance the cost function to improve sparsity performance and reconstruction quality. Finally, the fruit fly optimization algorithm is used to determine the adjustable parameters of the Morlet wavelet to flexibly match the characteristics of the analyzed data. The proposed method is used to analyze the raw vibration data collected from a sun gear unit and a roller bearing unit. Experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to other state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations216
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207