Untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliotic girls display altered balance modalities during self-paced voluntary body sways compared to able-bodied girls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated self-paced voluntary oscillations of scoliotic and non-scoliotic girls. Temporal variables and frequency coherence were calculated for the overall, low and high frequency bandwidths of the center of pressure excursions and free-moment to identify which variables best describe sway balance modalities in both groups. METHODS: Twenty-three girls with adolescent idiopathic moderate scoliosis (spinal curves to the right) formed the scoliotic group and 19 matched able-bodied girls formed the non-scoliotic group. Each girl performed self-paced voluntary medio-lateral and antero-posterior sways while standing on a force platform. Center of pressure displacements, out of plane deviation and free-moment were measured and their frequency content calculated. The magnitude of the coherence was calculated for each signal pairs for three frequency ranges. RESULTS: In both sway conditions, the center of pressure excursion parameters were on average 28% higher for the scoliotic group. Factor analysis revealed that balance modalities were essentially based on frequency coherence pair interactions whereas temporal parameters play a secondary role. However, these balance modalities were altered in the scoliotic group. They relied essentially on 2 additional principal components and 3 additional variables reflecting a fine tuning of the control mechanism to maintain dynamic balance. INTERPRETATION: Scoliotic girls appear to be performing a wide ellipsoidal trajectory when performing whole body oscillations. Superfluous variables could be related to the difficulty in preserving balance during body sway tasks and could parasitize the scoliotic dynamic control balance modalities. Self-paced voluntary sways could be an appropriate complementary balance test for untreated scoliotic girls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".