MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126749963 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356

Prenatal diagnosis of vascular ring: evaluation of fetal diagnosis and postnatal outcomes

2021· article· en· W3126749963 on OpenAlexaff
Safwat Aly, Koyelle Papneja, Wadi Mawad, Edgar Jaeggi, S.-J. Yoo

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrenatal diagnosisVascular ringFetusDuctus arteriosusAortic archFetal echocardiographyPregnancyInternal medicineObstetricsAorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The performance of fetal echocardiogram in diagnosing vascular ring (VR) and its impact on postnatal outcomes has not been well examined. Methods We reviewed all patients with VR diagnosis from 2000-2020. Results 50 patients with antenatal diagnosis of VR; 42(84%) with right aortic arch aberrant left subclavian artery and left-sided ductus arteriosus ((RAA-ALS) and 8(16%) with double aortic arch (DAA) were compared to 120 patients with postnatal diagnosis; 90(75%) with DAA, 22(18%) with RAA-ALS (Table 1). Prenatal diagnosis of VR increased over study period; 4 vs 31, 10 vs 29, 14 vs 25, 22 vs 35 between 2000-2005, 2005-2010, 2010-2015, and 2015-2020 respectively, p< 0.01. Prenatal diagnosis of VR was associated with less symptoms [26(52%) vs 72(60%), p < 0.003] and less cross-sectional imaging [22(44%) vs 82(69%), p = 0.0001]. Postnatal diagnosis of VR was associated with more surgical interventions (102(85%) vs 28(56%), p = 0.002), later surgical repair (22.9 ± 35 vs 12.6 ± 10.2 months, p < 0.01), more postoperative complications [8/102 (7.8%) vs 1/28 (3.5%), p = 0.04] and more residual symptoms (2/28(7%) vs 30/102(29%), p = 0.001 respectively]. Conclusion Prenatal diagnosis of VR has evolved over time. RAA-ALS versus DAA were dominant in the prenatally and postnatally diagnosed cohorts respectively. Prenatal diagnosis of VR was associated less symptoms, less cross-sectional imaging, earlier age of surgical intervention and less residual symptoms. Table 1 Prenatal Diagnosis (N = 50) Postnatal Diagnosis (N = 120) p-value Gestational Age (weeks) 39 ± 3 38 ± 2 0.9 Male (%) 31 (62%) 69(58%) 0.8 Subtype of vascular ring: Double aortic arch RAA-ALSA Others 8 (16%) 42 (80 %) 0 (0 %) 90 (72%) 22 (17%) 8 (11%) 0.002 0.01 Associated intracardiac CHD: VSD TOF DORV AVSD Coarctation of aorta Others 11 (22%) 1 1 3 0 3 3 24 (20%) 5 7 2 2 3 5 0.8 Associated genetic diagnosis: 22q11 deletion Trisomy 21 Others 9 (18%) 6 3 0 32 (26%) 29 3 0 0.1 Symptomatic presentation: Respiratory Gastrointestinal 26 (52 %) 15 11 72 (60 %) 57 15 <0.03 Age at first symptoms (month) 3.2 ± 2.8 21.6 ± 37 0.01 Diagnostic modalities: Fetal echocardiogram Postnatal echocardiogram Barium swallow Bronchoscopy CT scan MRI 50 (100%) 50 (100%) 2 (4%) 3 (6%) 18 (36 %) 4 (8%) 0 (0%) 120 (100%) 23 (25 %) 18 (15 %) 65 (54%) 7 (14%) Surgical repair 28 (56%) 102 (85%) 0.02 Age at surgical repair (month) 12.6 ± 10.2 22.9 ± 35 <0.01 Postoperative complications 1 (3%) 8 (7%) 0.03 Residual symptoms 2 (1%) 30 (25%) 0.001 Age at most recent follow up (mo) 26 ± 7 60 ± 7 0.02 Table 1: Comparison of patients with prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis of vascular ring

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207