Reviews – Compte rendus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hersant, Marc et Catherine Ramond (s.la dir. de). Les portraits dans les recits factuels et fictionnels de l’epoque classique. Par Sanda Badescu. Dubosson, Fabien. Des-admirer Barres. Le prince de la jeunesse et ses contre-lecteurs (1890-1950) . Par Vittorio Frigerio. Mitchell, Robin. Venus Noire: Black Women and Colonial Fantasies in Nineteenth-Century France. By Hope Christiansen. Noonan, Mary, and Joelle Pages-Pindon, eds. Marguerite Duras: Un theâtre de voix / A Theatre of Voices. By Mariah Devereux Herbeck. Grenaudier-Klijn, France. La Part du feminin dans l’oeuvre de Patrick Modiano: Fonctions et attributs des personnages feminins modianiens. By Eileen M. Angelini. Stout, John C. Objects Observed: The Poetry of Things in Twentieth Century France and America. By Anne Quinney. Romaniuc-Boularand, Bianca. Louis-Ferdinand Celine : Recurrence lexicale et poesie du style dans Voyage au bout de la nuit. Par Jean Wilson. Mathis-Moser, Ursula et Marie Carriere (dir.), Ecrire au-dela de la fin des temps ? /Writing Beyond the End Times? Les litteratures au Canada et au Quebec/The Literatures of Canada and Quebec. Par Sophie Beaule. Ippolito, Christophe (s. la dir de). Recit de vie, recit de soi. Par Sanda Badescu. Chassaing, Irene. Dysnostie. Par Caroline Strobbe. Bota, Jean-Paul & David Hebert. Chartres et environs. Par Michael Bishop. Gyssels, Kathleen. Marrane et marronne. La co-ecriture reversible d’Andre et de Simone Schwarz-Bart. Par Vittorio Frigerio. Wampole, Christy. Degenerative Realism. Novel and Nation in Twenty-First-Century France. By Gavin Bowd. Bauberot, Jean, Philippe Portier et Jean-Paul Willaime. La Secularisation en question. Religions et laicites au prisme des sciences sociales. Par Vittorio Frigerio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.598 | 0.645 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".