MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126850159 · doi:10.55275/jposna-2021-231

Radiographic Hip Screening in Cerebral Palsy: Developing POSNA-Wide Consensus

2021· article· en· W3126850159 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin J. Shore, Kishore Mulpuri, M. Wade Shrader

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
FundersPediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America
KeywordsCerebral palsyMedicineProtocol (science)Physical therapyRadiographyOrthopedic surgeryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population based studies have found that approximately 33% of children with cerebral palsy are at risk for progressive lateral hip displacement/subluxation during childhood. There is growing evidence supporting the practice of hip surveillance for children with cerebral palsy and many developed countries have established national and state surveillance programs. However, across POSNA there is a lack of consensus regarding a radiographic hip screening protocol for children with cerebral palsy. Therefore, the purpose of this quality initiative was to develop a POSNA-wide radiographic hip screening schedule using a Modified Delphi technique. A group of 24 pediatric orthopedic surgeons participated in the Modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus regarding a hip radiographic screening protocol. The development of a POSNA - wide radiographic hip screening protocol has the potential to standardize screening practices across our society, decrease practice variation and ultimately improve the quality of health care delivery for children with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular conditions.  

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North AmericaSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207