MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analisis Peramalan Volume Ekspor Melon di PT Bumi Sari Lestari Temanggung Jawa Tengah

2021· article· en· W3126974893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda Apriyanti, Agus Setiadi, Siswanto Imam Santoso

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural scienceNonprobability samplingMelonAgricultural economicsBusinessOperations managementMathematicsEconomicsGeographyEnvironmental scienceHorticultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Export is an activity of sending goods abroad carried out by a company to increase profits and obtain a better selling price. Companies can optimize profits by minimizing uncertainty in the future by calculating sales forecasting which is useful for planning product inventory to be marketed. PT. Bumi Sari Lestari is one of the exporters in Central Java which exports one of the vegetable and fruit horticultural commodities, namely melons. The purpose of this study was to determine how much the forecast value of the volume of melon exports for the first quarter and second quarter of 2020 at PT. Bumi Sari Lestari uses the trend analysis method. This research was conducted on January 13, 2020 - February 9, 2020 at PT. Bumi Sari Lestari, Temanggung, Central Java. Determination The location of the study was determined intentionally (purposive). The research method used in this research is a case study. The data used are PT Bumi Sari Lestari's melon export sales data in the period of 2017-2019 (time series), monthly data analyzed quarterly from January 2017 - December 2019 with a total of 12 observations. The data analysis method uses the quadratic trend analysis method. The data stationarity test results show that the data is stationary. Melon export volume forecasting results at PT. Bumi Sari Lestari using the quadratic trend method gets results for forecasting in the first quarter of 2020 amounted to 15,767,427 kg and in the second quarter of 2020 amounted to 9,916,788 kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan AgribisnisSame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207