MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127009087 · doi:10.1109/tte.2021.3056114

Analysis and Design of Interleaved DCM Buck–Boost Derived Three-Phase PFC Converter for MEA

2021· article· en· W3127009087 on OpenAlexafffund
Sivanagaraju Gangavarapu, Akshay Kumar Rathore

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIEEE Foundation
KeywordsPower factorBuck converterConvertersBuck–boost converterBoost converterPower (physics)Total harmonic distortionVoltageĆuk converterSwitched-mode power supplyForward converterFlyback converterElectrical engineeringThree-phaseElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In more-electric aircraft (MEA), the synchronous generators are connected directly to the turbo engine to develop a constant-voltage variable-frequency (CVVF) ac supply bus. In addition, the MEA has adopted a high-voltage dc bus in its power system to cater to the various categories of load used by aircraft. Therefore, this change in power paradigm has created a requirement for ac-dc power factor correction (PFC) converters to convert CVVF ac to constant dc with high power quality in a reliable manner. In this article, a three-phase interleaved buck-boost-derived PFC converter is operated in discontinuous current conduction mode to realize the inherent unity power factor (UPF) operation for MEA wide range of supply frequency. The benefits of the proposed converter are higher power density, efficiency, and reliability. The advantages of the proposed converter are demonstrated by performing an analytical comparison with the single-cell three-phase buck-boost derived PFC converter and presented the relevant results. The experimental results from a 2.0-kW laboratory concept-proof hardware prototype have been provided to confirm the proposed converter UPF operation for a wide range of supply frequencies. A low input power factor of 0.9996 and a minimum current THD of 2.52% are recorded from the developed prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207