MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3127097470 · doi:10.53318/msp.v9i02.1510

Investigation d'un cas de récidive de méningite, W135 et Y à Yirimadio, Bamako, Juin 2019

2019· article· fr· W3127097470 on OpenAlexaff
S.I. Ouattara, Oumar Sangho, Hamadou Yalcouye, Boubacar Traoré, K Kayembé, CA Coulibaly, A A Sangho, Nouhoum Telly, Moctar Tounkara, Bakary Diarra, MS MS Konaké, HM HM NDiaye, OB Togola

Bibliographic record

VenueMali Santé Publique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesGynecologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La méningite est une inflammation des méninges : les enveloppes de la moelle épinière et du cerveau dans lesquelles circule le liquide céphalorachidien. Bien que les épidémies dans la ceinture méningitique soient dues à Neisseria meningitidis du sérogroupe A, la survenue en 2000 d'une épidémie au niveau mondial a permis de mettre en cause la responsabilité de N. meningitidis du sérogroupe W135, et en 2016 la survenue d'une épidémie de méningite causée par N. meningitidis du sérogroupe C au Mali. Un cas de méningite W135/y a été détecté par le service d'infectiologie du CHU Point G le 18 Juin 2019. Par la suite nous avons investiguer le cas de méningite W135/Y dans l'aire de santé de Yirimadio en commune VI dans le District de Bamako en Juin 2019. Notre objectif était décrire le cas, déterminer le potentiel de diffusion de la maladie, proposer des mesures de contrôle. Il s'agissait d'un patient de 42 ans avec méningite W135 et Y ayant bénéficié d'une meilleure prise en charge au CHU contrairement au cabinet privé. La guérison a intervenu sans séquelles. Nous avons effectué un briefing du personnel du cabinet par rapport à son implication dans la surveillance épidémiologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMali Santé Publique→Same topicBacterial Infections and Vaccines→French-language works237,207→