MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127099740

치매안심센터를 이용하는 지역사회 노인들의 가상현실기반 뇌채움 인지훈련이 인지기능에 미치는 효과

2020· article· ko· W3127099740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
김두리, 김권민, 송승환, 허업, 장재혁, 탁영진, 박종환

Bibliographic record

Venue고령자·치매작업치료학회지 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroop effectMemory spanPsychologyAudiologyCognitionMedicinePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

목적 : 본 연구는 치매안심센터를 이용하는 지역사회 노인을 대상으로 가상현실기반 뇌채움 인지훈련이 인지기능에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 한다. 연구방법 : 치매안심센터를 이용하는 지역사회 노인 10명을 대상으로 주 2회 12주간, 회당 50분씩 가상현실기반 뇌채움 인지훈련을 시행하였다. 인지기능의 효과를 알아보기 위해 중재 전과 후의 Korean Mini-Mental State Examination(K-MMSE), Korean Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment(K-MOCA), Digit Span Test(DST), Controlled Oral Word Association Test(COWAT), Digit Symbol Coding(DSC), Korean-Color Word Stroop Test(K-CWST) 평가를 시행하였다. 연구결과 : 가상현실기반 뇌채움 인지훈련 중재 전과 후의 인지기능을 비교한 결과 K-MMSE(P=.019)와 Stroop Word(P=.011) 평가에서 통계적으로 유의한 증가가 나타났다. 결론 : 가상현실기반 뇌채움 인지훈련은 지역사회 노인들에게 실제와 같은 일상생활활동의 훈련 환경을 조성하여 가상현실이라는 공간에서 만족감을 얻어 경험하고 행동할 수 있게 한다. 또한, 재미와 흥미유발을 통한 집중력 증진이 치매예방 및 인지기능 향상에 도움을 주어 치매안심센터를 이용하는 지역사회 노인들에게 적절한 중재 프로그램으로써 적용해볼 수 있다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue고령자·치매작업치료학회지Same topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207