On the Relationship of the O(<sup>1</sup>D) 630.0 nm Dayglow Emission to the F10.7 cm Solar Flux and the Solar Zenith Angle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) Empirical Model, which provides the characteristics of the O( 1 D) 630.0 nm atomic oxygen dayglow emission from the upper atmosphere has been reviewed and updated. It now includes the Integrated Emission Rate, the peak Volume Emission Rate, the Altitude of that peak and the Full Width at Half Maximum as functions of the F10.7 cm Solar Radio Flux and the solar zenith angle (SZA). The model employs 98,617 WINDII observations obtained between the years 1992 and 1996, and the model and observations of the Integrated Emission Rate agree well with one another within 2 standard deviations of 588.7 Rayleigh (R) (10 6 photons cm −2 sec −1 ). It is also demonstrated that the impact of latitude, longitude and day of year, independently of their contribution to the SZA, is very small. The WINDII Empirical Model is also shown to agree with results from the TRANSCAR photochemical model. The dayglow is challenging to measure with ground‐based instruments, as the solar scattered light from the daytime sky must be accurately subtracted from the data. Ground‐based measurements of the integrated emission rate have been made by others, with good agreement for observations from Hyderabad during the 2015 summer and winter, but mixed agreement with measurements made over Boston in 2003. The latter results are reviewed and assessed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".