MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127219265 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3057594

Resource Management for Secure Computation Offloading in Softwarized Cyber–Physical Systems

2021· article· en· W3127219265 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Wang, Ning Zhao, Bin Song, Peng Lin, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersState Key Laboratory of Integrated Services NetworksNatural Science Foundation of Shaanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingDistributed computingEdge computingMarkov decision processLatency (audio)Resource management (computing)Computation offloadingCyber-physical systemComputer networkComputer securityMarkov process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) makes an increased emphasis on extending their computing and storage capabilities by relying particularly on the cloud/edge computing (EC) for cyber-physical systems (CPSs). Especially, in software-defined CPS (SD-CPS), different software-defined networking (SDN) controllers share information and cooperate to make global decisions. To further enhance system security during the information sharing process, we introduce blockchain technology into SD-CPS. However, because many security-related decisions are sensitive to latency, it is vital to minimize the system latency in blockchain-empowered SD-CPS. In this article, a blockchain-empowered distributed SD-CPS framework is proposed to realize consensus and distributed resource management by offloading data in a hybrid network paradigm that combines cloud computing and EC. Moreover, to adaptively implement offloading and control strategies while guaranteeing data security, we design a resource management scheme for reducing system latency and provide the flexibility of cooperation. To foster intelligence, we formulate the joint communication, computation, and consensus problems as a Markov decision process and use deep reinforcement learning to balance resource allocation, reduce latency, and guarantee data security. Compared with other schemes, simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme, which performs better on self-adaptation decision making and system delay reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207