Early life environmental exposures have a minor impact on the gut ecosystem following a natural birth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests that the environment is an important source of colonizing bacteria for the gastrointestinal tract of C-section delivered infants, who undergo multiple birth-related interventions; however, the extent to which environmental microbes impact vaginally delivered infants remains unclear. Here we investigated the impact of rural and urban environmental exposures on microbial establishment and immunity in vaginally delivered mice. We simulated rural and urban home environments by adding soil types to cages from breeding to weaning. Our aims were to determine the impact of rural and urban soil exposures on the gut microbiome in young mice and to understand whether these changes persisted into adulthood. Host immune cytokines and microbial short-chain fatty acids were quantified to understand the impact on immunity. We found that early-life soil exposure had a minor effect on the richness of the neonatal gut microbiota contributing 5% and 9% variation in the bacterial community structure between mice during early-life and adulthood, respectively. Exposure to urban soil increased Clostridiaceae and propionic acid which persisted into adulthood. While soil exposure had a limited effect on the gut taxa, systemic cytokine and chemokine profiles were altered in adulthood. The findings presented here show that unlike in C-section deliveries previously reported, environmental exposures following a natural birth have a limited impact on the gut microbial taxa but potentially play an important role in immune-mediated disease susceptibility later in life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".