MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127350324 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.02974

Cutoff for Random Walks on Upper Triangular Matrices

2019· preprint· en· W3127350324 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Hermon, Sam Olesker-Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsConjectureMathematicsCutoffHeisenberg groupDihedral groupAbelian groupCayley graphGroup (periodic table)Random walkGraphPhysicsStatisticsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the random Cayley graph of a finite group $G$ with respect to $k$ generators chosen uniformly at random, with $1 \ll \log k \ll \log |G|$ (ie $1 \ll k = |G|^{o(1)}$). A conjecture of Aldous and Diaconis (1985) asserts, for $k\gg\log|G|$, that the random walk on this graph exhibits cutoff. When $\log k \lesssim \log\log|G|$ (ie $k = (\log |G|)^{\mathcal O(1)}$), the only example of a non-Abelian group for which cutoff has been established is the dihedral group. We establish cutoff (as $p\to infty$) for the group of $d \times d$ unit upper triangular matrices with integer entries modulo $p$ (prime), which we denote $U_{p,d}$, for fixed $d$ or $d$ diverging sufficiently slowly. We allow $1 \ll k \lesssim \log |U_{p,d}|$ as well as $k\gg\log|U_{p,d}|$. The cutoff time is $\max\{\log_k |U_{p,d}|, \: s_0 k\}$, where $s_0$ is the time at which the entropy of the random walk on $\mathbb Z$ reaches $(\log |U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}|)/k$, where $U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab} \cong \mathbb Z_p^{d-1}$ is the Abelianisation of $U_{p,d}$. When $1 \ll k \ll \log |U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}|$ and $d \asymp 1$, we find the limit profile. We also prove highly related results for the $d$-dimensional Heisenberg group over $\mathbb Z_p$. The Aldous--Diaconis conjecture also asserts, for $k gg\log |G|$, that the cutoff time should depend only on $k$ and $|G|$. This was verified for all Abelian groups. Our result shows that this is not the case for $U_{p,d}$: the cutoff time depends on $k$, $|U_{p,d}| = p^{d(d-1)/2}$ and $|U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}|=p^{d-1}$. We also show that all but $o(|U_{p,d}|)$ of the elements of $U_{p,d}$ lie at graph distance $M \pm o(M)$ from the identity, where $M$ is the minimal radius of a ball in $\mathbb Z^k$ of cardinality $|U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}| = p^{d-1}$. Finally, we show that the diameter is also asymptotically $M$ when $k \gtrsim \log |U_{p,d}^\textrm{ab}|$ and $d\asymp1$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicGraph theory and applicationsFrench-language works237,207