MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127350837 · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab030

Transcriptomic analysis of gonadal development in parasitic and non-parasitic lampreys (<i>Ichthyomyzon</i>spp.), with a comparison of genomic resources in these non-model species

2021· article· en· W3127350837 on OpenAlexafffund
Nisha Ajmani, Tamanna Yasmin, Margaret F. Docker, Sara V. Good

Bibliographic record

VenueG3 Genes Genomes Genetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLampreyBiologyPetromyzonGermlineTranscriptomeGeneGenomeSomatic cellRNA-SeqGeneticsEvolutionary biologyGene expressionFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lampreys are jawless fishes that diverged ∼550 million years ago from other vertebrates. Sequencing of the somatic and the germline genomes of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in 2013 and 2018, respectively, has helped to improve our understanding of the genes and gene networks that control many aspects of lamprey development. However, little is known about the genetic basis of gonadal differentiation in lampreys, partly due to the prolonged period during which their gonads remain sexually indeterminate. We performed RNA-sequencing on gonadal samples from four chestnut lamprey (Ichthyomyzon castaneus) and six northern brook lamprey (I. fossor) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEG's) and pathways associated with transcriptomic differences in: (1) larvae during early gonadal differentiation versus definitive females (i.e., with oocytes in the slow cytoplasmic growth phase); and (2) females versus definitive males undergoing spermatogonial proliferation. We compared the mapping percentages of these transcriptomes to the two available sea lamprey reference genomes and three annotation files (Ensembl and UCSC for the somatic genome and SIMRbase for the germline genome). We found that mapping the RNA-seq reads to the germline genome gave superior results and, using Trinotate, we provided new putative annotations for 8161 genes in the somatic assembly and 880 genes for the germline assembly. We identified >2000 DEG's between stages and sexes, as well as biological pathways associated with each. Interestingly, some of the upregulated genes (e.g., DEG's associated with spermiation) suggest that changes in gene expression can precede morphological changes by several months. In contrast, only 81 DEG's were evident between the chestnut lamprey (that remains sexually immature during an extended post-metamorphic parasitic feeding phase) and the nonparasitic northern brook lamprey (that undergoes sexual maturation near the end of metamorphosis), but few replicates were available for comparable stages and sexes. This work lays the foundation for identifying and confirming the orthology and the function of genes involved in gonadal development in these and other lamprey species across more developmental stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueG3 Genes Genomes GeneticsSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207