A Practical Introduction to Motion-Sensing Phenomenology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La phenomenologie est une approche de recherche qui decrit et analyse une experience vecue. La phenomenologie du mouvement senti se distingue des autres domaines etudies en phenomenologie; cette distinction tient a la primaute du mouvement, non seulement dans les diverses dimensions de l’activite physique presentes mais egalement dans cette construction de sens du « je », tant kinesique que kinesthesique. Cet article a comme objectif d’offrir une forme d’accompagnement a la conceptualisation d’une recherche en phenomenologie du mouvement senti. Nous y discutons l’importance de (a) se sentir attire par un sujet de recherche, (b) formuler des questions de recherche qui evoluent d’une realite du mouvement pris pour acquis et fonctionnel a une realite experientielle du « flow », (c) s’engager dans des questions de recherche par un ecriture qui demeure ancree dans les mouvements abordes. Les significations d’ordre tactile-kinesique, kinesthesique sont d’un attrait evident car la phenomenologie du mouvement senti transforme en langage intelligible ce qui est souvent cache et ineffable. Les significations emergentes et les transformations possibles sont surtout en lien avec une appreciation plus grande de notre vie active et des interactions. Mots cles : phenomenologie; kinesthesie; mouvement; flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".