Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement: a new polycarbonate urethane valve
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement has become a valid treatment option for right ventricular outflow tract diseases. However, some limitations occur in patients with wide, compliant right ventricular outflow tracts that might be amenable to treatment with self-expanding valved protheses. An experimental ovine study was designed to evaluate a novel dip-coated, low-profile trileaflet polycarbonate urethane (PCU) heart valve mounted into a self-expandable nitinol stent. METHODS: The PCU valves were produced by a dip-coating technique, mounted in a conical-shaped nitinol stent and provided with a leaflet thickness of 100-150 µm. The valved stents were implanted percutaneously via transfemoral access in 6 consecutive sheep divided into 2 groups. Three animals were followed up for 1 month and the remainder, for 6 months. Angiographic measurements and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before and after implantation and at the end of the 1- or 6-month observation period, respectively. RESULTS: Orthotopic positioning of the valve was achieved in all animals. All except 1 had competent valves during the follow-up period. The peak-to-peak gradient across the PCU valved stents was 4.6 ± 1.0 mmHg after 1 month and 4.4 ± 2.3 mmHg after 6 months of follow-up. Macroscopic and microscopic post-mortem evaluation indicated good morphological and structural results. There were no stent fractures, leaflet calcification or thrombus formation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates successful transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with a novel dip-coated valved nitinol stent. The trileaflet PCU prostheses indicated good functional and biocompatible properties after a 6-month observation period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".