Effects of <i>Tilletia foetida</i> on Activities of Three Defense Enzymes in Wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To reveal the effect of Tilletia foetida (Wallr.) Liro on defense enzymes activities in wheat stems, leaves and ears, the cultivar 'Dongxuan 3' highly sensitive to wheat common bunt and 'Yinong 18 / Lankao Aizao 8' highly resistant to wheat dwarf bunt were used as test materials to study the activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) after 0~6 days of infection by the Tilletia foetida . The results showed that the activities of defense enzymes of the two wheat varieties were significantly increased. Except for the increase of CAT activity in the leaves of susceptible varieties, the activities of POD and SOD in stems and spikes of resistant varieties were higher than those of susceptible varieties, and the enzyme activities of resistant varieties lasted for a long time and the change range was more gentle. The activity of defense enzyme in the leaves of the two cultivars was higher than that in the stems and spikes, CAT and POD activity in the spikes showed the earliest peak of enzyme activity. All the three kinds of defense enzymes were correlated with disease resistance of wheat, which could provide theoretical basis for breeding resistance to common bunt of wheat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".