MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127646479 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040210

Piperacillin–tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a study protocol for a non-inferiority open-label randomised controlled trial (PeterPen)

2021· article· en· W3127646479 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Roni Bitterman, Fidi Koppel, Cristina Mussini, Yuval Geffen, Michal Chowers, Galia Rahav, Lior Nesher, Ronen Ben‐Ami, ‪Adi Turjeman‬‏, Maayan Huberman Samuel, Matthew P. Cheng, Todd C. Lee, Leonard Leibovici, Dafna Yahav, Mical Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMinistry of Health, State of IsraelUniversità di BolognaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversità di PisaUniversità degli Studi di VeronaEuropean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious DiseasesMcGill University Health CentreJewish General HospitalTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMcGill University
KeywordsMeropenemMedicinePiperacillin/tazobactamTazobactamPiperacillinCarbapenemCephalosporinInternal medicineAntimicrobial stewardshipIntensive care medicineClinical trialRandomized controlled trialCarbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceaeAntibioticsEnterobacteriaceaeAntibiotic resistanceMicrobiologyPseudomonas aeruginosaImipenemBiologyEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections has yet to be defined. Retrospective studies have shown conflicting results, with most data suggesting the non-inferiority of beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations compared with carbapenems. However, the recently published MERINO trial failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of piperacillin-tazobactam to meropenem. The potential implications of the MERINO trial are profound, as widespread adoption of carbapenem treatment will have detrimental effects on antimicrobial stewardship in areas endemic for ESBL and carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Therefore, we believe that it is justified to re-examine the comparison in a second randomised controlled trial prior to changing clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: bloodstream infections. The study is currently being conducted in six centres in Israel and one in Canada with other centres from Israel, Italy and Canada expected to join. The two primary outcomes are all-cause mortality at day 30 from enrolment and treatment failure at day seven (death, fever above 38°C in the last 48 hours, continuous symptoms, increasing Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score or persistent blood cultures with the index pathogen). A sample size of 1084 patients was calculated for the mortality endpoint assuming a 12.5% mortality rate in the control group with a 5% non-inferiority margin and assuming 100% follow-up for this outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by local and national ethics committees as required. Results will be published, and trial data will be made available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03671967); Israeli Ministry of Health Trials Registry (MOH_2018-12-25_004857).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207