MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127654632 · doi:10.1109/tia.2021.3058227

Design, Implementation, and Validation of Electro-Thermal Simulation for SiC MOSFETs in Power Electronic Systems

2021· article· en· W3127654632 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsManitoba HydroUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon carbideJunction temperatureReliability (semiconductor)Electronic engineeringPower modulePower semiconductor devicePower MOSFETHeat sinkDiodeMOSFETPower electronicsPower (physics)Transient (computer programming)Computer scienceMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon carbide (SiC) mosfets are getting popular in high-frequency power electronic (PE) applications. More and more concerns for system efficiency and reliability are growing due to the increasing switching losses and thermal stress. In this article, an electro-thermal simulation method for SiC mosfets in modern PE systems is proposed. In the device simulation, a behavioral transient model of SiC mosfets is developed and used for generating a multidimensional power loss table in a wide range of operating conditions. The effects of parasitic elements, temperature-dependent parameters, and reverse recovery effect of the diode are taken into account. Furthermore, the power loss look-up table is integrated into the PE system simulation with an additional Cauer-based dynamic thermal model considering heatsink impact. In this way, the instantaneous power losses and junction temperature can be obtained, respectively, with fast simulation speed, reasonable accuracy, and improved simulation convergence. The proposed approach is implemented in PSCAD/EMTDC and further validated by the experimental results of a double pulse test setup and a power factor correction system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it