MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127833719 · doi:10.26443/mjm.v2i2.818

Functional Status May Serve as a Predictor of CABG Surgery Outcome in the Elderly Patient

2020· article· en· W3127833719 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chantal Mayer, Jean‐François Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineAnginaInternal medicineCoronary artery bypass surgeryFunctional impairmentArterySurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the growing number of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, no study addressing postoperative outcome from the perspective of preoperative functional status has been reported to date. The present investigation therefore undertook to determine, among elderly individuals matched for cardiac status, whether patients with poor functional status have a greater risk of mortality and morbidity following CABG surgery than those with good functional status. Retrospective preoperative and postoperative geriatric functional assessment using a standardized questionnaire was performed on 46 consecutive patients who had undergone CABG in 1994 at age 65 or older. Preoperative functional status was comprised of pre-anginal functional status (before angina limited physical activity) and anginal functional status (during which angina was a noticeable limiting factor). CABG outcome was recorded in terms of postoperative assessment of functional status, morbidity, and mortality. The results of statistical analysis revealed that both pre-anginal and anginal functional status were sensitive predictors of post-operative functional status (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the presence of comorbidities typically used in the screening of candidates was found to be a sensitive predictor of outcome (p < 0.02). However, the presence of comorbidities was not significantly linked to poor preoperative functional status (p > 0.05), indicating that these two predictors may screen for different elderly sub-populations at high risk for negative outcome of CABG. If confirmed by further studies of elderly patients undergoing CABG, these results suggest a new and important role for functional status as a predictor of CABG outcome in the elderly. Furthermore, these results may be useful toward the development of a reliable tool in screening for high risk of poor outcome among elderly candidates for CABG surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of MedicineSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207